We are already in heaven, if not in hell

Lazarus Kwedhi

What if we are already in heaven? The question sounds spiritual, but it is deeply political and economic. Across religion, economics, and politics, the same moral lesson is preached in different languages: sacrifice now, be rewarded later.

Clergymen promise heaven after death. Economists promise development after structural adjustment. Politicians promise prosperity after the next election.

The vocabulary changes, but the structure does not. The reward is always deferred, and the gatekeepers remain the same.

Christianity teaches Namibians to trade competing values – righteousness against sin – while waiting for judgment day. Believers endure poverty on earth so they can inherit the Kingdom of God, a place without pain.

Economically, the world is divided into “developed” and “developing” nations. This language was born at the Bretton Woods Conference after World War II to rebuild Europe. 

The IMF and World Bank were created to reconstruct infrastructure destroyed by war. Europe used those same institutions to reach first-world status.

But when Africa, including Namibia, inherited the label “developing,” the outcome changed. Under IMF structural adjustment programmes and World Bank loans, Europe moved from rubble to prosperity.

Namibia and other sub-Saharan states remained trapped in debt, dependency, and stagnant growth. We became “third world,” “junk state,” “lower middle income.”

The same medicine produced different results. That contradiction forces a hard question: Why did the prescription heal Europe but keep Africa sick?

The answer lies in recognising that heaven and hell, developed and developing, rich and poor, are not only spiritual, economic, and political concepts.

They are global frameworks that define who deserves comfort now and who must wait. Rating agencies, UN reports, and World Bank indicators function as secular judgment day.

A downgrade is our economic “sin.” Debt and dependency become the bottlenecks that keep us in hell, while sanctions and commodity pricing keep the gate closed.

Religion, economics, and politics preach the same message through different mouths. Pastors and prophets preach helping the poor and casting out demons, yet the poor and demonised fund lavish lifestyles through tithes while dreaming of sweets in heaven.

Politicians preach closing the gap between rich and poor, yet they win legitimacy from poor voters while living in privilege.

Colonial apartheid used race: white against black. Post-independence politics uses new labels liberator against collaborator, PLAN against Koevoet. The actors change, but the script remains: convince the majority that salvation is elsewhere so they do not revolt against conditions here.

Namibia is rated rich in natural resources but poor in development. That is the bitter truth. Without developing countries, there is no market competition for developed ones.

Without heaven and hell, certain institutions lose their power. Without poor voters, certain politicians lose legitimacy.

The global capitalist system chases profit and monopoly at Africa’s expense. Pastors and prophets secure salaries from desperate believers.

Politicians secure votes from struggling citizens. All three, globalists, pastors and prophets, and politicians, benefit when Africans do not question the framework.

If heaven represents developed countries with high living standards, and hell represents developing countries with poverty, crime, and unemployment, then “what if we are already in heaven” becomes a call to self-knowledge.

We are already in heaven if we recognise that Namibia’s copper, uranium, land, and green hydrogen are wealth – the sweet in heaven.

We are in hell if we continue to define ourselves by downgrades and debt ratios written by institutions that never lived in Katutura or Ondangwa.

Decolonisation of the mind is not rocket science. It is a matter of understanding the basic foundation of economics and markets: demand and supply, profit and monopoly, spoken from different mouths.

It means accepting that we cannot stop the wind from blowing, but we can learn to navigate it. The global economic and social order has thrown Africa into a deep ocean. We either learn to swim or we drown.

That learning starts with wisdom and understanding. Namibians must study how international politics and economics actually work. Loans, ratings, trade agreements, and commodity markets must become public knowledge, not mysteries controlled by “experts.”

But wisdom alone is not enough. It must be guided by Ubuntu: “I am because of you; they are because of us.” The current system thrives on “ versus you” – developed against developing, rich against poor, heaven against hell.

Ubuntu destroys that logic. If my prosperity is tied to yours, exploitation becomes self-harm. If the nation’s wealth is “our” wealth, then resource extraction must benefit the collective, not a few elites.

The moral is simple: unlock the mind. Unmask the frameworks that keep Africans waiting for heaven after death or development after the next loan. A true post-independence revolution will not come from rejecting the world but from redefining it.

Namibia must write its own report cards. We must define prosperity by food sovereignty, community land rights, and human dignity, not only by GDP.

We cannot prevent the wind, but we can set the sail. The ocean is Africa itself. Global capital needs us to stay afloat. Once we know that, we stop asking permission to enter heaven. We build it here, with wisdom, with Ubuntu, and with the courage to swim.

Related Posts