Niël Terblanché
The Namibian Judiciary has responded firmly to misinformation circulating on social media, which it says aims to discredit the institution’s integrity and transparency.
In a statement issued by the Judiciary’s executive director, Benhardt Kukuri, the office reaffirmed its independence and commitment to upholding the rule of law.
Kukuri stressed that the Judiciary operates independently in accordance with Namibia’s Constitution and the law, and it remains solely accountable to these guiding principles.
“The members of Namibia’s Judiciary, bound by their oath to uphold and protect the Constitution, owe their loyalty exclusively to the Constitution and the law,” he said.
According to Kukuri, judicial officers take an oath to uphold the Constitution and laws of Namibia upon their appointment.
He reassured the public that legal avenues exist for individuals who believe that a judge may be conflicted in a particular case.
“Individuals who have reason to believe that a judge may be conflicted on any legally recognised ground have the right to file a formal complaint through established channels or to seek the recusal of such a judge,” he said.
Addressing concerns about judicial appointments, Kukuri stated that such appointments follow strict legal processes as outlined in Article 80(1) of the Constitution.
He pointed out that the recent appointment of the previous Deputy Judge-President of the High Court to the Supreme Court was conducted following legal provisions.
“The appointment of Deputy Judge(s)-President aligns with ongoing efforts to strengthen the Judiciary’s capacity and enhance the administration of justice,” he said.
Kukuri dismissed any claims of irregularities in judicial nominations, stating that vacant judicial positions are filled through established legal procedures.
“Judicial nominations for vacant positions are conducted via established legal processes and channels in accordance with the Judicial Service Commission Regulations,” he explained.
He added that designated organisations are invited to submit nominations within a specified timeframe, ensuring transparency in the selection process.
Kukuri said the Judiciary is committed to transparency by consistently submitting its annual reports on time.
These reports detail the Judiciary’s activities and provide an account of the resources allocated to fulfilling its mandate.
Kukuri reiterated that judicial decisions are made publicly available, ensuring that the legal process remains accessible and accountable.
In light of the growing misinformation campaign, Kukuri urged the public to refrain from casting doubt on judicial officers without credible evidence.
“The Judiciary once again urges the public to resist the inclination to cast aspersions on judges, either individually or collectively, as such actions may erode public confidence in an institution dedicated to delivering justice with impartiality and integrity,” he warned.
Despite its firm stance against unsubstantiated attacks, the Kukuri acknowledged the Judiciary’s openness to constructive criticism and said it is dedicated to excellence in judicial service.
“The Judiciary remains steadfast in its commitment to transparency, independence, and upholding the rule of law across all its operations,” he said while also encouraging the public to engage with relevant judicial authorities or consult official platforms for accurate updates.
