29
Oct
The allegations surrounding a voice recording purportedly involving Deputy Prosecutor General Edmund Marondedze are serious enough to warrant more than public speculation and social-media commentary. They demand a careful, credible and impartial examination of what happened, how the recording came into existence, who circulated it and whether any of the statements attributed to the senior prosecutor are authentic. At the same time, allegations must remain allegations until they are properly established. The recording, by itself, should not become a substitute for evidence, nor should the public rush to conclusions about the conduct or motives of individuals mentioned in it. That…
